About Me

My Life as a Reader

published January 2, 2012

I’m Mary Jo, and I’m a reader. Ever since I learned to read, I have loved books. My best childhood memories are reading with my mother and siblings, making trips to the library and toting home stacks of paperbacks, and spoiling my eyesight finishing a book after bedtime. When I was in elementary school, I would read the textbooks from cover to cover just to have something to do and to be able to say I did it. When I was in high school, I felt cheated when I discovered that my sophomore English teacher was teaching us straight from Cliff’s Notes. “Isn’t there more to these books than these rote questions and responses?” I wondered. The following year, AP English Lit was my favorite class, where my favorite teacher of all time, Mr. Jim McDonough, who looks just like the British comedian Rowan Atkinson (or Mr. Bean) taught me close reading. I followed my reading bug to Centre College in Danville, Kentucky, a small, rigorous liberal arts college where I majored in English and Spanish. At Centre I dove into classes on Shakespeare and Austen, the Romantics, Transcendentalists, and Southern Agrarians, Arthurian legends and Greek philosophy. I also got to spend a semester in Merida, Mexico. I lived the life of the mind and loved every minute.

When it came time to figure out what to do after graduation, I decided to pursue a dream. I figured that no matter what happened later, even if my dream utterly failed, I would feel better knowing that I set out to try for it at the first opportunity, rather than settling early and putting it off. (That might have been a slightly fatalistic way to think of it, but I told myself I was mixing my wildly idealistic optimism with a healthy dose of reality.) I wanted to write, and being the risk-averse, academic-oriented, school-loving 21-year-old I was, I figured the best way to do that was to attend a writing program.

Why did I want to write? Idealizing books had led logically to idealizing their writers, and I thought that the most high and noble thing anyone could do was to create fictional worlds to gift to others, to help them escape whatever they needed to escape and to fill them with joy and make them think, even for just a moment. Ever ambitious, I wanted to try to do the thing that I thought was the greatest and most important thing in the world. I didn’t think much about whether I liked it or was good at it. I wanted to do it because of the value and esteem I held, and mostly still hold, for writers. At that point I actually didn’t have much experience writing fiction. The only short story I wrote in the four years I spent in college was the one I used in my grad school applications. Before that, the only short story I wrote in high school was one that I was assigned to write as a freshman, using a very specific prompt. The one kind of writing I did have plenty experience with was journaling. I have been journaling since I was about twelve. There are boxes of notebooks in my parents’ basement, I think, full of teenage drama. By now, over half of my life has been committed to paper. (Hopefully, this experience will prove useful for blogging.)

I applied to a handful of programs in my senior year at Centre, and was accepted at the University of Cincinnati’s program for a Masters of Arts in English, with a creative thesis and a concentration in fiction. I spent two years there, teaching freshman composition courses, taking classes with intimidatingly intelligent and accomplished professors and classmates, and writing overly serious short stories about shy young women with relationship issues. Also, living in my parents’ house, waiting tables, and traveling to Tennessee about every other month.

At the end of my time at UC, I decided I was moving to Nashville to be closer to David, who was my long-distance boyfriend at the time, and who is now my husband of 17 months. I made some halfhearted applications to Vanderbilt’s MFA and PhD programs, but by then I could pretty much tell that my time in academia was over. I knew I didn’t have the heart for cross-country moves or the academic job hunt, and I doubted I had the intellectual focus or endurance. I figured the bargain I had made while applying to grad schools initially had been fulfilled. I had tried for the dream and failed, and would now be happier in a settled life for having at least tried it. God, that was a bleak way to think of the rest of my life. How about this: more optimistically, I had decided to make a life and a living now, rather than putting off love and gainful employment any longer, and, besides, I could write anytime, and now grad school had given me some of the skills, discipline, and judgment I’d need to make something out of any worthwhile idea I might have later on in life. Whew. That’s better.

So I taught for English composition for freshmen for a year at Belmont University. That was a part-time gig, so I was very, very poor. But it was great to be in a classroom where the students were intellectually engaged and enthusiastic. The low pay created an unsustainable situation for my bank account, though, so I applied to the Nashville Teaching Fellows program, which trains alternatively licensed teachers and places them in urban classrooms. I ended up in McGavock High School, the largest high school in Tennessee, teaching Spanish II and English III. My English classes were all male students from the “STEM Academy,” which in our school meant auto shop. You can imagine how excited those kids were about writing five-paragraph persuasive essays. At the end of the year new teachers were let go in budget cuts, and I ended up at Glencliff High School, the most diverse school in Tennessee. I taught English III and English IV to students in the “Hospitality Academy,” which in our school meant cosmetology and culinary arts. I liked Glencliff because the students were more respectful than McGavock students and the faculty was young and vibrant. But again, at the end of the year, new teachers were let go in budget cuts. Luckily, I had 4 offers, because 97% of my students had passed the TCAP writing exam. I chose the Academy at Old Cockrill, a nontraditional high school which only accepts students ages 17-21 who are making up credits to get their high school diplomas. Classes are small and students are screened through an interview process in order to get in. This is my fourth school in four years, but I want to stay here. It’s challenging, but in a way that I feel I can handle. Because there are so few students, I feel like I’m actually able to create relationships with them. They’re interesting people.

There have been times in my recent history when I stopped reading for fun. Late high school, most of college, all of graduate school, and my first year and a half teaching in public school. It was no fun. Reading is very important to me. But in the past year or two, my reading habit has come back in a big way. I’m reading more than ever, and more widely and systematically than ever. And I have some things to say about what I’ve been reading.

Recent Posts

Watership Down

Watership Down by Richard Adams


This book has the biggest, most sexist plot hole I’ve ever seen. The rabbits leave their warren to start a new warren, AND THEY FORGET TO BRING ANY FEMALES. Rabbits are known for procreating quickly, so you’d think these otherwise smart little animals would have figured out the problem here a lot more quickly than they do. I don’t understand how the male rabbits could have so much time to spend together in exclusively male company when they should be having sex all the time SINCE THEY’RE RABBITS.

Of course, closing this plot hole by including females in the original group would have blown the entire second half of the book. But here’s the thing: if the plot of half your book depends on your main characters idiotically ignoring the existence of half their species, that’s a sign the plot is pretty weak to begin with.

And that’s all before I go into the way the male rabbits talked about female rabbits like objects, Macguffins, prizes to win, or, at best, princesses to rescue. I don’t even have to discuss the way this erasure of female characters perpetuates a world in which men and their stories matter more than women. Without even getting into explicitly feminist criticism, it’s clear that the plot of this book doesn’t function on a purely logical level. The book was written in 1972 so it can’t even be excused on the grounds that people were just that sexist back then.

Another aspect I didn’t like was Fiver’s prophecy stuff. It seems like it makes things too easy to have decisions made for you on high like that. Life isn’t like that for humans. Maybe it is for rabbits. Or maybe Adams needed a way to jump start the plot and get the group of rabbits to leave, and there is no other way they could have known about the human plans to destroy their warren. Again, it seemed like a weak way to structure or fuel a plot.

Maybe I’m being too harsh. The political ideas behind the two dystopian rabbit societies that Hazel and his friends encounter were interesting. There are some really nice descriptions of the natural world. I liked some of the stories-within-the-story about El-ahrairah, a trickster akin to Brer Rabbit. Some of the rabbits’ schemes were creative and interesting, especially when they convinced or used other animals to help them. The chapter from the human point of view at the end was a great touch, a disorienting reorientation. But on the whole, this book reminded me of my son’s current favorite story, The Three Little Pigs. Its plot is a house of straw: one puff and it all falls down.

  1. City of Glass Leave a reply
  2. Vanity Fair Leave a reply
  3. Prayers for the Stolen Leave a reply
  4. The Book of Life Leave a reply
  5. Winter’s Tale Leave a reply
  6. What We Talk About When We Talk About Our Daily Lives 1 Reply
  7. A Day in the Life: 16 months Leave a reply
  8. Southern Festival of Books Recap Leave a reply
  9. Gone Girl: The Movie 1 Reply